While virtually all the proctored testing that pan does is in the HR space, there is a huge amount of proctored testing that takes place within an education context--think PSAT, SAT,  MCAT, GRE, LSAT and the like. A recent NYT piece focuses on the problem of proctors who fail to do their jobs or even manage to be disruptive during SAT testing sessions. The article indicates that SAT proctors are not specifically trained for the task (which surprised me a bit since our policy is to train all proctors on each program they supervise).  And reviewing some of the reported issues that occur during paper and pencil testing, it is clear that computer-based test administration (as we use in our testing centers) can ensure a much more standardized experience in terms of test timing, the right test forms going to the right candidate, and the like.

One bit of advice provided by an SAT test coach (yes, this is apparently a whole industry in and of itself) is that if a candidate notices a problem during test administration, he or she should either voice a complaint immediately and ask that it be addressed or “forget about it” (as opposed to simply grumbling about it after the fact). Here, it is important that test takers assume some responsibility in advocating for themselves by pointing out problems if they become apparent. The coach also goes on to say that “you have to expect that there will be distractions. If you’re seated next to a kid who is muttering under his breath, or sneezing, or grunting, just deal with it. Move on.”

Reid Klion